You are so adept at fleshing out an idea fully and leaving the reader - not with a commentary - but a new way of seeing. I related your words to love as well. . .how many people choose to stay in the realm of fantasy rather than descending into the glorious "sloppiness" of human love - we stay distant enough to create perfection, or we have affairs in our head because they are constructed just as we wish. But to love, you have to welcome the flaws. You have to make a mess. Thanks for another stellar piece.
Feb 4, 2023·edited Feb 4, 2023Liked by Charles Schifano
This is one of the best posts I've read in a while. It's applicable across every creative realm. I'm extending that realm to an even wider array by including anything that requires any depth of creativity to undertake. As a writer, I deal with imperfection all the time, and yes, it's a struggle to accept. But to not accept the inevitability of imperfection is a surefire way to freeze in their tracks any artist or creative attempting to produce work of any personal value.
Mar 12, 2023·edited Mar 12, 2023Liked by Charles Schifano
Wonderful piece. Brought to mind an oft-circulated quote by Ira Glass that I think about – and offers salvation – from time to time:
“Nobody tells this to people who are beginners, I wish someone told me. All of us who do creative work, we get into it because we have good taste. But there is this gap. For the first couple years you make stuff, it’s just not that good. It’s trying to be good, it has potential, but it’s not. But your taste, the thing that got you into the game, is still killer. And your taste is why your work disappoints you. A lot of people never get past this phase, they quit. Most people I know who do interesting, creative work went through years of this. We know our work doesn’t have this special thing that we want it to have. We all go through this. And if you are just starting out or you are still in this phase, you gotta know its normal and the most important thing you can do is do a lot of work. Put yourself on a deadline so that every week you will finish one story. It is only by going through a volume of work that you will close that gap, and your work will be as good as your ambitions. And I took longer to figure out how to do this than anyone I’ve ever met. It’s gonna take awhile. It’s normal to take awhile. You’ve just gotta fight your way through.”
Thank you for sharing that quote and for the kind words—that is a really good description of a tricky process. Unfortunately, I think a lot of artists become discouraged in those beginning stages, and don't realize the discrepancy of comparing their first attempts to more experienced artists. It happens implicitly, and the discouragement often lingers without an endpoint. So it is important for artists to compare what they create to what they previously created—with the standard being their own improvement rather than some elusive greatness in others. An honest assessment of whether you are improving over time is always possible and also happens to get you closer, little by little, to that ideal.
Couldn't agree more. Of course, it doesn't help that quantitative growth plays such an outsized role in that assessment. I can understand why artists get discouraged when they put out better stuff but there's no change in the numbers (readers, subscribers, etc.) As quoted, just gotta fight your way through.
Absolutely. Although it is worth making sure that the metric of quality isn't determined by extraneous metrics—such as readers and subscribers. Those are important, and perhaps can be markers of improvement, but they shouldn't be the standard for the individual who is doing the creating.
Wow Charles, this may be one of my favorites of yours. (I’ve been waiting for a quiet mind to read it, finally found it this morning.) It really speaks to the “suffering” that any creative person goes through when they have that flash or vision of perfection and then must muddle through their flawed ability to bring it to life (this being just how I’d describe how it feels for me). I laughed because I thought: now here’s a piece that could never be written by ChatGPT!
Thank you very much for the comment. I'm pleased to hear it, and your last line is certainly appreciated—perhaps that's the right threshold for writing now.
I like the idea of striving for perfection, knowing it’s mostly out of reach. Ignoring perfection may remove stress, but invites mediocrity. Done may trump perfect, but then sometimes I prefer a failed, incomplete piece of art with glimmers of perfection over a completed but merely adequate piece of art. Lastly, your piece somehow called up thoughts of ChatGPT, which many writers and artists fear could put them out of business. But perhaps it will force us to dig deeper into our human uniqueness, enticing glimmers of individual perfection, instead of the adequate but largely derivative offerings from ChatGPT. Thanks for another thoughtful essay.
This is nicely put: "Done may trump perfect, but then sometimes I prefer a failed, incomplete piece of art with glimmers of perfection over a completed but merely adequate piece of art." Thank you for the comment.
I really enjoyed this piece. It is incredibly well written. It explores an idea I assume every artist struggles with. And it delivers a message of hope in a poignant and unforced manner. Thank you
You are so adept at fleshing out an idea fully and leaving the reader - not with a commentary - but a new way of seeing. I related your words to love as well. . .how many people choose to stay in the realm of fantasy rather than descending into the glorious "sloppiness" of human love - we stay distant enough to create perfection, or we have affairs in our head because they are constructed just as we wish. But to love, you have to welcome the flaws. You have to make a mess. Thanks for another stellar piece.
Thank you very much for the kind and thoughtful words.
This is one of the best posts I've read in a while. It's applicable across every creative realm. I'm extending that realm to an even wider array by including anything that requires any depth of creativity to undertake. As a writer, I deal with imperfection all the time, and yes, it's a struggle to accept. But to not accept the inevitability of imperfection is a surefire way to freeze in their tracks any artist or creative attempting to produce work of any personal value.
Thank you for the kind words.
Wonderful piece. Brought to mind an oft-circulated quote by Ira Glass that I think about – and offers salvation – from time to time:
“Nobody tells this to people who are beginners, I wish someone told me. All of us who do creative work, we get into it because we have good taste. But there is this gap. For the first couple years you make stuff, it’s just not that good. It’s trying to be good, it has potential, but it’s not. But your taste, the thing that got you into the game, is still killer. And your taste is why your work disappoints you. A lot of people never get past this phase, they quit. Most people I know who do interesting, creative work went through years of this. We know our work doesn’t have this special thing that we want it to have. We all go through this. And if you are just starting out or you are still in this phase, you gotta know its normal and the most important thing you can do is do a lot of work. Put yourself on a deadline so that every week you will finish one story. It is only by going through a volume of work that you will close that gap, and your work will be as good as your ambitions. And I took longer to figure out how to do this than anyone I’ve ever met. It’s gonna take awhile. It’s normal to take awhile. You’ve just gotta fight your way through.”
Thank you for sharing that quote and for the kind words—that is a really good description of a tricky process. Unfortunately, I think a lot of artists become discouraged in those beginning stages, and don't realize the discrepancy of comparing their first attempts to more experienced artists. It happens implicitly, and the discouragement often lingers without an endpoint. So it is important for artists to compare what they create to what they previously created—with the standard being their own improvement rather than some elusive greatness in others. An honest assessment of whether you are improving over time is always possible and also happens to get you closer, little by little, to that ideal.
Couldn't agree more. Of course, it doesn't help that quantitative growth plays such an outsized role in that assessment. I can understand why artists get discouraged when they put out better stuff but there's no change in the numbers (readers, subscribers, etc.) As quoted, just gotta fight your way through.
Absolutely. Although it is worth making sure that the metric of quality isn't determined by extraneous metrics—such as readers and subscribers. Those are important, and perhaps can be markers of improvement, but they shouldn't be the standard for the individual who is doing the creating.
Wow Charles, this may be one of my favorites of yours. (I’ve been waiting for a quiet mind to read it, finally found it this morning.) It really speaks to the “suffering” that any creative person goes through when they have that flash or vision of perfection and then must muddle through their flawed ability to bring it to life (this being just how I’d describe how it feels for me). I laughed because I thought: now here’s a piece that could never be written by ChatGPT!
Thank you very much for the comment. I'm pleased to hear it, and your last line is certainly appreciated—perhaps that's the right threshold for writing now.
I like the idea of striving for perfection, knowing it’s mostly out of reach. Ignoring perfection may remove stress, but invites mediocrity. Done may trump perfect, but then sometimes I prefer a failed, incomplete piece of art with glimmers of perfection over a completed but merely adequate piece of art. Lastly, your piece somehow called up thoughts of ChatGPT, which many writers and artists fear could put them out of business. But perhaps it will force us to dig deeper into our human uniqueness, enticing glimmers of individual perfection, instead of the adequate but largely derivative offerings from ChatGPT. Thanks for another thoughtful essay.
This is nicely put: "Done may trump perfect, but then sometimes I prefer a failed, incomplete piece of art with glimmers of perfection over a completed but merely adequate piece of art." Thank you for the comment.
I really enjoyed this piece. It is incredibly well written. It explores an idea I assume every artist struggles with. And it delivers a message of hope in a poignant and unforced manner. Thank you
Thank you very much for the kind words and the comment.